Transportation Bill Moving Forward
- Published: Friday, 01 June 2012 11:18
- Written by Mark Kuhar
On May 8, the Surface Transportation Bill Conference Committee began negotiations to reconcile the Senate’s surface transportation bill, MAP-21 (S. 1813), with the measure approved by the House (H.R. 4248).
In a letter to conference Chairman Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), and Vice Chairman Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.), The Association of Equipment Distributors (AED) urged committee members to produce a bipartisan conference report before the current highway program extension expires on June 30.
“The nation’s transportation network is in desperate need of investment and certainty,” AED President and CEO Toby Mack and 2012 AED Chairman Larry Glynn, president of CMW equipment, told lawmakers. “By restoring stability to federal transportation programs, a final conference report approved by both chambers will help create and sustain millions of jobs.”
The urgent need for a new highway bill and the persistent effort of equipment distributors to pass a bill are reaching the highest levels. Chairman Boxer, in her opening remarks, specifically referenced the impact that delays surrounding reauthorization have on equipment distributors. “I learned from the Associated Equipment Distributors that the same uncertainty has caused construction businesses to rent equipment that in the past they had the confidence to buy. This has depressed their businesses, placing a further drag on the economy and increasing unemployment,” Boxer said.
Boxer and Mica, continue to praise their respective versions of the highway bill. Though the talks have thus far been bipartisan in nature, some feel the more contentious differences in the bills, such as how to pay for the infrastructure projects, could ultimately drive progress to a halt.
Approval of the Keystone XL pipeline in a conference report remains one of the most talked about issues. While many Democrats continue to view the project as an impediment to the success of the conference report, Mica has stated that Keystone approval was moving forward.
Though progress appears slow, key staff have been meeting regularly and conference leaders remain confident that the committee will produce a final report. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Ranking Member Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.) estimated the initial stage of negotiations to last one or two more weeks, with more contentious issues possibly taking longer to reconcile.
Mirroring the uneven economic recovery, the housing market is expected to move in a slow, gradual upward path in 2012, while encountering its share of speed bumps along the road, according to economists participating in the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) construction forecast webinar on the housing and economic outlook.
While the latest monthly housing data have shown signs of a slight softening, NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe said this is more reflective of typical month-to-month volatility in the numbers and unusual seasonal factors than they are an indication of any significant downward trend in the broader housing market.
“The aggregate information suggests we’re just in a pause mode right now in terms of these measures,” said Crowe, who noted this could partly be the result of an early spring that brought much better weather than usual into the picture at the start of this year and pulled some housing activity forward.
Pointing out that less volatile quarterly data have continued to show modest improvement in key housing indicators such as builder sentiment, new-home sales and housing production, Crowe said the “housing outlook continues to slowly brighten.”
Crowe noted that numerous other fundamentals remain positive for housing at this time, including demographic factors (with pent-up household demand expected to ramp up and echo-boomers heading into their prime household formation ages), historically favorable mortgage rates that are not expected to move higher than 5 percent by the end of next year, more than 100 local markets currently listed on the NAHB/First American Improving Markets Index, and the fact that house price-to-income ratio has now returned to its historical average of about 3-to-1 versus the nearly 5-to-1 to which it had previously risen during the height of the housing boom.
However, he cautioned that housing still continues to face formidable challenges of its own – such as rising foreclosures, persistently tight lending standards for home buyers and builders and difficulties in obtaining accurate appraisals. Moreover, disappointing job growth numbers in March and uncertainty in the European economy are undermining prospects for a vigorous recovery.
“No one is anticipating that an upward path for housing will run in a straight-line trajectory,” said Crowe. “The economy is in an uneven recovery and we can expect some corresponding ups-and-downs in the housing market in the months ahead. However, NAHB believes that on the whole, we can expect a slow and gradual recovery in housing starts, home sales and the overall housing market in 2012.”
New-home sales are expected to climb from a record-low of 305,000 units in 2011 to 357,000 this year and 505,000 in 2013. Existing single-family sales are expected to follow suit and rise from 3.8 million last year to 4.4 million in 2012 and 5.4 million next year.
Housing starts are also anticipated to move in the same upward trajectory, Crowe said, with single-family housing production increasing from 434,000 units last year to 503,000 this year and a more solid 660,000 in 2013.
On the multifamily side, starts posted a healthy 55 percent increase in 2011 over 2010.
“A lot of newly formed households have become renters, so we need more rental units,” Crowe said. “We don’t expect to see the same rate of increase moving forward, but we should continue to see a healthy recovery.”
NAHB is anticipating that multifamily starts will rise from 177,000 units last year to 216,000 in 2012 and 235,000 in 2013.
With many households choosing to stay in place and remodel their homes rather than move, residential remodeling is expected to rise 12 percent this year and another 7.9 percent in 2013.
Delving into the economic forces that housing will be contending with in the next two years, Chris Varvares, senior managing director and co-founder of Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC, projected growth in the gross domestic product of 2.6 percent this year and about 3.3 percent in 2013.
Citing a number of risks to this outlook, Varvares said the “eurozone is the 800 pound gorilla in the room,” and if Spain or Italy face a financial default, the effects could spill over into the U.S.
Soaring oil prices and the standoff with Iran over its nuclear stance could also unnerve financial and commodity markets.
In the U.S., he said that the payroll tax holiday, emergency unemployment benefits, and the Bush-era tax cuts are all due to expire at the end of the year. So if Congress does not act, he said we could be “hitting a fiscal cliff.”
On the plus side, he said that increasing household formations, rising real incomes, steadily upward payroll growth and a bullish stock market will contribute to the current economic expansion.
Turning to the housing front, Varvares said “we believe we have hit the trough in home prices” and expects prices to be flat this year and to rise 1.5 percent in 2013.
He anticipates 514,000 single-family starts in 2012 and 751,000 next year. Multifamily housing production should hit 221,000 this year and 238,000 in 2013.
“Our long-term analysis suggests that given the demographics, we need to build roughly 1.6 million units a year over the next decade to meet demographic demand for housing,” said Varvares. “Obviously, we are now well below that. We do believe we will see a fairly nice run in 2013 and beyond as we need to build those units.”
Looking at various state statistics behind the national numbers, Robert Denk, NAHB’s assistant vice president for forecasting and analysis, noted a range of conditions across the country and differences among the states in the amount of distress suffered during the recession and the headway that is being made in recovering.
Housing nationwide bottomed out at an average 27 percent of normal production, which he defines as the residential building that occurred in 2000 to 2003, before the housing boom.
The hardest hit states – such as California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona – bottomed out at between 10 percent and 15 percent of normal production, while better states, in sharp contrast, declined to 50 percent of normal production.
Denk said that housing prices are drifting back to near-normal in many states. The number of states where house prices now exceed their historic trend are continuing to recede, joining the states where prices are in the normal range.
Some states however, such as Arizona and Nevada, have seen an overcorrection of boom prices and will take longer to get back to normal.
Nationally, he said prices have dropped back to normal. “What we are seeing is stabilization of house prices across the country, back to nearly their historical averages,” he said.
Most states saw their foreclosure rates jump from an average of 0.5 percent during the period before the boom to a peak of nearly 1.5 percent in the third quarter of 2009, but there were those – such as California, Arizona, Florida and Nevada – where foreclosures increased by a factor of four, five or six times normal.
Nationally, foreclosure rates have dropped back down to an average of 1 percent, and while they remain a problem in most markets, they are at crisis proportions in only a few, Denk said. He added that Texas and Florida have roughly the same number of mortgages, but Florida has four times as many foreclosures.
The protracted housing recovery now underway will bring housing starts to 40 percent of normal production by the fourth quarter of this year and 55 percent of normal by the end of 2013.
Getting back to normal considerably faster will be oil states Texas and Oklahoma; coal and natural-gas producing Wyoming and Montana; and Iowa, supported by agricultural commodities.
The U.S. Census Bureau of the Department of Commerce reported that construction spending during March 2012 was estimated at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $808.1 billion, 0.1 percent (±1.4 percent) above the revised February estimate of $807.3 billion.
The March figure is 6.0 percent (±1.9 percent) above the March 2011 estimate of $762.6 billion. During the first three months of this year, construction spending amounted to $171.2 billion, 6.7 percent (±1.6 percent) above the $160.4 billion for the same period in 2011.
Spending on private construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $531.9 billion, 0.7 percent (±1.3 percent) above the revised February estimate of $528.1 billion.
- Residential construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $244.1 billion in March, 0.7 percent (±1.3 percent) above the revised February estimate of $242.5 billion.
- Nonresidential construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $287.8 billion in March, 0.7 percent (±1.3 percent) above the revised February estimate of $285.7 billion.
In March, the estimated seasonally adjusted annual rate of public construction spending was $276.2 billion, 1.1 percent (±2.2 percent) below the revised February estimate of $279.1 billion.
- Educational construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $69.1 billion, 1.2 percent (±3.5 percent) below the revised February estimate of $70.0 billion.
- Highway construction was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $77.0 billion, 0.8 percent (±7.7 percent) below the revised February estimate of $77.6 billion.